Re: burning issue [was Re: weekly call for telecon agenda items]

* Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org> [2003-09-03 14:49-0400]
> Dan Brickley wrote:
> > 
> > This is the usual weekly call for agenda items for the telecon.
> > Suggestions needed by noon uk time Thursday please.
> > 
> > possible topics:
> > 
> > browsing http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/
> > 
> >  - spec publication status
> > 
> > - heads up re TAG rdfURIMeaning-39 and public-sw-meaning
> >    see
> >    http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0068.html
> >    interested parties invited to join public-sw-meaning. Do we have
> >    anything further to say as a WG?
> > 
> > - % in URIs?
> > 
> > - xmlsch-02 whitespace
> >  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0038.html
> >  "I think this means that we should be regarding Dave's comment as
> >  currently  unaddressed, since there has been no formal resolution to decline the
> >  comment." --jjc
> > 
> > - subclass on datatypes
> > 
> > - %YOUR_BURNING_ISSUE_HERE%
> 
> Can we please burn all issues and related correspondence involving typed
> literals (particularly those involving XML)?

Sorry, according to the XML Query strongly typed extensions to the XML Schema PSVI data
model, they're inflammable...

Dan

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 15:05:55 UTC