Re: semantics and lbase docs

Jeremy Carroll wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> pat hayes wrote:
> 
> 
>> For some reason, the pubrules checker thinks that there is something 
>> wrong with the boilerplate, but it seems to have all the links and 
>> things that the checker says are missing, all cut-and-pasted from docs 
>> that the checker was OK with. The other filters are OK.
>>
> 
> 
> Yes it's very fussy - concepts gets through - I was following Frank's msg.
> 
> I suggest that whoever picks up on semantics SOTD copies it from 
> concepts or primer.
> 
> Guessing: the problem with DanBri's boiler plate was that a paragraph 
> was required to be in <em> and wasn't.
> 
> Jeremy
> 


There are lots of other possible (and similarly innocuous) problems.  I 
just put the new boilerplate into Primer (mostly copied from the latest 
Concepts), and it now complains about the fact that the word "last call" 
appears, but there's no ending date (however, it says you can ignore 
it).

--Frank




-- 
Frank Manola                   The MITRE Corporation
202 Burlington Road, MS A345   Bedford, MA 01730-1420
mailto:fmanola@mitre.org       voice: 781-271-8147   FAX: 781-271-875

Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2003 08:25:53 UTC