Re: (draft) SOTD for Sept 5th RDFCore WDs

* Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> [2003-09-02 15:59+0100]
> looks ok to me.
> 
> I suggest that we particularly want to highlight i18n's xml lang/xml 
> literal issue and request feedback, say in both concepts and in syntax, 
> and in the announcement.

Yes, at least in the documents. I didn't attempt this in the boilerplate
I drafted since it is intended to be mixed-in with per document text.

> Does it make sense for such highlighting to go in the status section?

I think so.

Dan

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2003 11:10:43 UTC