- From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 15:36:10 +0100 (BST)
- To: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0320.html Transcript: http://ilrt.org/discovery/chatlogs/rdfcore/2003-08-29 swebscrape:N3:python: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/scripts/minutes2n3.py date: 2003-08-29 Roll call: Dave Beckett Dan Brickley Mike Dean Jan Grant (scribe) Graham Klyne Brian McBride (chair) Eric Miller Patrick Stickler Regrets: Jeremy Carroll, Frank Manola, Jos de Roo Review agenda: Eric: notes that additional action iterms that were logged last week have been extracted. Next telecon: 05 Sep 2003 1000 Boston Time Minutes of last telecon: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0263.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0316.html additional actions: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0332.html Approved. Confirm status of completed actions: all Done. Misc actions: Formally WITHDRAWN: 20030815#2 danbri summarise rubyrdf for em Item 8: I18N update DanBri: JJC's I18N text is technically accurate; feel that more information is required on the reasons for rejecting the wrapper solution. ACTION: 2003-08-29#1 daveb track down LC comments on wrapper solution \ for XMLLiteral [ DaveB pointed these out: wrapper comment 1: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2002OctDec/0109.html wrapper comment 2) (reagle, LC) http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0434 ] ACTION: 2003-08-29#2 jang check for/create if nec the xsd:string-entails- \ plain literal test case. Item 9: outstanding comments PFPS on normalisation: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0283.html DaveB: this is the same comment in essence as a previous one, I've replied extensively. We don't check our OWN datatype, let alone XSD types. pfps comment on sectin 6.4 of concepts http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0282.html ACTION: 2003-08-29#3 gk check CONCEPTS 6.4 wrt details of URI and "%" pfps on semantics http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0279.html (Skipped in PatH's absence) Item 10: xmlsch-02 We recently decided to fudge this, but this has had adverse comment from pfps http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0269.html and extensive discussion, see thread beginning ... http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Aug/0255.html GK: we should back off specifying the behaviour in the case of errors. The WG was essentially against "fudging" the interpretations of XSD literals wrt whitespace processing. Discussion omved to email. Item 11: next steps There was general concern that the WG should publish _something_ now. Various members felt that the consideration of "_just_ a WD" was not helpful; that publishing a WD should not be viewed as a retrograde step; that that NOT publishing anything was more harmful. Danbri: we shold feed back to the W3C that our [the W3C's] process punishes WGs for publishing specs. Danbri PROPOSED: to publish (with date of publication 5 September) new (plain) WDs (subject to PatH's agreement wrt semantics). Seconded: PatS. 0 against; HP abstained. Jos was absent, but for the record he was recorded as a likely abstention. ACTION: 2003-08-29#4 danbri update \ http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/templates/lc2-stod for WD Note to editors that pubrule checker is linked from here: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/ ACTION: 2003-08-29#5 gk to liase with JJC on removal of WS "fudge" \ from concepts ACTION: 2003-08-29#6 jang remove xmlsch-02 test cases. With the decision to publish, all editors need pubrule-ready documents by NOON EST on Wednesday, Sept 3 ACTION: 2003-08-29#7 (all editors) update cross-references to 5 Sept \ documents The meeting closed. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl Hacker\n"'
Received on Monday, 1 September 2003 14:55:49 UTC