At 12:15 31/10/03 +0000, Brian McBride wrote: >Graham Klyne wrote: > >[...] > >>>RDFCore would advise implementors that consume RDF that the RDFCore >>>specs are based on RFC 2396, a strict interpretation of which states >>>that URI's with too many ".."'s in their path are an error, though many >>>URI implementations correct that error and RFC 2396bis proposes to >>>require that correction. Implementors are free to choose whether to >>>strictly comply with RFC 2396 or be more liberal. >> >>I have broad agreement with the thrust here, but the last sentence might >>be interpreted as official permission to be non-standard. I suggest >>dropping it. > >I could live with that, though the intent of the last sentence is to give >permission to "be liberal in what you accept", i.e. correct errors. > >The original comment was "which should I use, 2396 or 2396bis." I'm >suggesting an explicit answer of "your call". I think we have to go with what is available. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#ContactReceived on Friday, 31 October 2003 07:52:58 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 31 October 2003 07:53:19 EST