Re: non english labels/comments for rdf.rdf and rdfs.rdf

I think this is a good idea, and illustrates RDF's non-centralized nature.

#g
--

At 08:57 31/10/03 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:


>Would it not make more sense to have distinct schemas for
>each languages labels. I.e.
>
>rdf_fr.rdf
>rdf_sp.rdf
>rdf_ge.rdf
>rdf_fi.rdf
>etc.
>
>Then, folks can syndicate whichever labels they like, as required.
>
>It also allows new language labels to be contributed without touching
>the core schema.
>
>Patrick
>
>
>
>On 2003-10-30 18:52, "ext Brian McBride" <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been trying to finish off rdf.rdf.
> >
> > Ralph requested we include non English labels.  I seem to remember
> > Danbri saying he would seek input on rdf interest.  Did we get any 
> response?
> >
> > Brian
> >
> >

------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact