W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2003

normative statement that xsd:string subclass of plain literals

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 10:35:39 +0100
Message-ID: <3F852BEB.4000401@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

Dave Reynolds was asking me about the relationship between plain 
literals and xsd:string, i.e is a plain literal without a lang tag 
(modulo some funny characters) an xsd:string.

I adopted the policy of referring him to the spec and indeed he came 
back and said "found it, its in the bit about entailment rules."

"Bu**er", I said, that section is now informative!

I just wanted to check whether we have a normative statement in the 
specs that

_:a eg:prop "aaa" .

xsd:string entails

_:a eg:prop "aaa"^^xsd:string .

for suitable values of "aaa".  I should check this myself, but I'm 
burned this morning and don't want to forget ...

Anyone know?  Does it matter?  Is there anything else we might have lost 
by making that section informative?

Received on Thursday, 9 October 2003 05:41:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:08 UTC