W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > October 2003

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-10-03

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:11:57 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <28571894.1065118300424.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-7>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Oct 03 2003 in America/New York duration 60 minutes

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Oct 03 2003 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: scribe - volunteer needed

Please could the minutes conform to:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0216.html



2: Roll Call


3: Thanks


4: Review Agenda


5: Next telecon 10 Oct 2003 1000 Boston Time
Volunteer Scribe



6: Minutes of 26 Sep 2003 telecon as revised


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0267.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0273.html


7: Confirm Status of Completed Actions

ACTION: 20030815#9 jjc
draft implementation report response to i18n objection

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0259.html

ACTION: 2003-08-29#1 gk
to check with aaron on status of the rdf mimetypes draft

see:
  http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-swartz-rdfcore-rdfxml-mediatype-03.txt

ACTION: 2003-09-12#3 jjc
mention other designs in I18N proposed response

ACTION: 20030919#1 jjc
review syntax text on bnode IDs

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0240.html

ACTION: 20030919#2 path
Check link to RDF URI Reference from Semantics to Concepts

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0014.html

ACTION: 20030919#3 jjc
change URI text in concepts

ACTION: 20030919#4 jjc
respond to pfps on URIs cc martin

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0346.html

ACTION: 20030919#5 bwm
s/none/no response/ in last call comments

see:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/

ACTION: 20030919#9 jjc
e-mail webont with 02 Oct comment deadline

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Sep/0222.html

ACTION: 20030919#10 danbri
e-mail rdfinterest with 02 Oct comment deadline

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Sep/0149.html

ACTION: 20030919#11 danbri
e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2003JulSep/0067.html

ACTION: 20030919#12 danbri
identify and e-mail individual chairs re LC 2

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/chairs/2003JulSep/0067.html

ACTION: 20030919#13 jjc
suggest herman makes personal comment before webont OK

ACTION: 20030919#14 PatH
To consider amendments to test cases concerning nonentailments

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0015.html

ACTION: 20030926#1 JJC
add nfc text to Concepts as proposed

ACTION: 20030926#2 JJC
review i18n rebuttal document to take specific account of formal objection text from i18n 

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Sep/0275.html

ACTION: 20030926#5 JJC
draft proposal that whitespace processing is part of L2V map

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0003.html

ACTION: 20030926#6 PatH
update semantics document to replace lbase appendix with fireproof reference to lbase doc

see:
  http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-mt-20030117/



8: Confirm Status of Withdrawn Actions

ACTION: 20030926#8 DanBri
record Karstens dissent in rdfs spec

see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0368.html



9: Status of Misc Actions


10: Update on last call comments
pfps-02,pfps-03 and pfps-06 resolved acceptably to pfps
pfps-12 resolved acceptably for Karsten

This leaves formal objections on pfps-04 and pfps-05 concerning the
entailment rules.



11: Literals must be in NFC
Consider changing language from MUST to SHOULD.


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0010.html
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Oct/0022.html


12: Meeting requirements for last call.

Have we addressed all outstanding comments/issues?  (xmlsch-02?)
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/ uptodate?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0358.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0005.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0363.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JulSep/0373.html

Have we done the best we can on the outstanding objections?
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/objections.html

Have we negotiated a reasonable LC review period with other groups?
20030919#11  	danbri  	e-mail chairs list concerning LC 2
20030919#12  	danbri  	identify and e-mail individual
                                chairs re LC 2

Are the documents ready?
20030919#8  	danbri  	produce boiler plate for SOTD
2003-08-29#2  	danbri  	to investigation production of
                                script for fixing up internal
                                references
20030919#7  	ericm  	contact comm to get publication date

Are there any features that should be identified as "at risk"?

Change logs correct?
Diffs from previous versions?

 primer
 concepts
 syntax
 schema
 semantics
 test cases
20030919#14  	PatH  	To consider amendments to test cases concerning
                         nonentailments



13: Handling lc2 comments.



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant, running on Jena 2
Received on Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:14:39 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:14:46 EDT