W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Updated issue tracking doc to include objections and responses

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 12:23:39 -0600
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1068661419.13402.83.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 13:42, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-11-06 at 12:21, Brian McBride wrote:
[...]
> > I've taken into account feedback from DanC, which includes stating the 
> > conflicting requirements on the datatypes objection and some (much 
> > shorter) text on the I18N issue.
> 
> Umm... this looks OK (except the "we request..." sentence, about
> which more below), but the shorter text was intended for
> the request for PR. I'd prefer to see the table of
> designs that the WG evaluated in the issues list under
> http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure

Brian, in order to be responsive to the I18N LC2 review,
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html
I think it's best to have the whole story there.

Shall I go ahead and put it there?

Do you have any pending edits since
Revision 1.216  2003/11/11 19:59:19 ?



-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 13:26:22 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 12 November 2003 13:26:38 EST