In the absence of arguments that this change is editorial and not substantive, I ask that the chairs reopen the PR decision, in order to consider the resolution of Herman's last call comments which triggered this change. [This is nullified if Pat or others, can make a compelling case that I have misunderstood the situation, and the correct understanding of the two test cases is the same in both LC2 semantics and the current editors draft] Sorry Jeremy relevent test cases > > rdfms-seq-representation/Manifest.rdf#test002 > > rdfms-seq-representation/Manifest.rdf#test004Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:57:43 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Tuesday, 11 November 2003 02:57:46 EST