W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Test case document, simple entailment: preferred option.

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 00:52:32 +0100
To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFD7318619.22BAA7A9-ONC1256DD7.0081D651-C1256DD7.00832D55@agfa.be>


DanC:
[...]
>> The point about datatype selection in the last case being closed-world
>> is still true. To really deal with that, the expression of
>> "supported datatypes" should be done using a parseType=collection-style
>> rdf:List.
>
> that appeals to my intuition, though we haven't finished our
> cwm-based harness work, so I can't say with much confidence
> whether I need it.

Also my intuition, however we actually don't need it
in our implementation as we load a set of xsd-rules
(for all xsd primitive datatypes) as soon as we have
a test case with test:datatypeSupport (which might be
wrong for negative entailment tests but then we are
typically undecided).

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 18:52:37 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Friday, 7 November 2003 18:52:39 EST