- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 00:52:32 +0100
- To: "Dan Connolly <connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
DanC: [...] >> The point about datatype selection in the last case being closed-world >> is still true. To really deal with that, the expression of >> "supported datatypes" should be done using a parseType=collection-style >> rdf:List. > > that appeals to my intuition, though we haven't finished our > cwm-based harness work, so I can't say with much confidence > whether I need it. Also my intuition, however we actually don't need it in our implementation as we load a set of xsd-rules (for all xsd primitive datatypes) as soon as we have a test case with test:datatypeSupport (which might be wrong for negative entailment tests but then we are typically undecided). -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 18:52:37 UTC