- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 17:46:01 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 09:06 07/11/03 -0600, Dan Connolly wrote: >This just in... >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003OctDec/0120.html > >I'm noodling on whether it's sufficient new information >for me to reconsider my position on >http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure > >I encourage others to do likewise. I don't think there's any new information there (in the first three points) that we didn't have when we considered this during LC. (FWIW, I have considered my position on #rdfms-literal-is-xml-structure, but I don't plan to say anything more unless it comes up for discussion.) #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Friday, 7 November 2003 12:53:37 UTC