W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

RE: Call for agenda items

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 10:41:44 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20031106102958.025fe620@127.0.0.1>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At this stage of the game, if we choose to make any substantive changes in 
response to these comments I think they should be simple excisions.

I could see removing the preference for the first Alt as an excision.  Or 
simply removing Alt all together?  There's nothing special about rdf:Alt 
that users couldn't define their own vocabulary for it.  (Personally, I 
think Alt is rather like the human appendix:  of little practical value and 
a potential source of inflammation.)

#g
--

At 10:41 06/11/03 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>If we are short of things to discuss, the I18N comment that is still brewing
>surfaced here
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-i18n-ig/2003Nov/0008.html
>
>(member only link)
>
>I find the Alt argument the most interesting of the things we haven't seen
>before; it would be interesting to know if the WG would be happy to make the
>change Martin suggests (no default, all items have equal weight)
>
>I understand that they have asked for an extension, so this looks critical
>path given the good status of the rest of the comments ....
>
>The other comments either are editorial or the expected substantive comments
>on XMLLiteral.
>
>If we have a full agenda we should hold off discussing this comment until it
>is made.
>
> >
> > This is the usual weekly call for agenda items.
> >
> > Suggestions to the list please.
> >
>
>Jeremy

------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 05:55:23 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Thursday, 6 November 2003 05:55:25 EST