W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2003

Re: RDFCore teleconference: 2003-10-31

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:14:21 +0100
To: "Graham Klyne <gk" <gk@ninebynine.org>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA9B20E66.AA32B920-ONC1256DD2.003CE7E2-C1256DD2.003DC26B@agfa.be>


[...]

> There is also some concern that the claim of two implementations passing
> each test case is not sufficiently sunstantiated.  Maybe the evidence is
> there is properly presented?
>
> DaveB, please look at test case work by Jeremy and Jos, and determine
> if this is easily put into a form in which it can be checked/presented
> using the OWL test case software.

A while back I ran the tests and the results are at
http://www.agfa.com/w3c/temp/rdf-result.rdf
(I still haven't found a way to *pass* the negative
entailment tests)

--
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:19:52 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Sunday, 2 November 2003 06:20:05 EST