Following discussion with Peter on the rdf comments list, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0099.html I propose the following closure of the issue http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-24 'what is rdf schema?' which was raised initially by Peter in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0149.html proposed resolution: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003AprJun/0099.html [ > Would the following revision to the paragraph quoted address your concern: > > "RDF's vocabulary description language, RDF Schema, is a > semantic extension([SX]) of RDF. It provides mechanisms for describing groups > of related resources and the relationships between these resources. > RDF Schema vocabulary descriptions are written in RDF using the terms > described in this document." > > ref [SX] RDF Semantics > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#intro > ] Peter accepted this proposal, and notes that we should look out for other places where similar issues occur. I have checked RDFS for this. I am therefore asking that the WG close this issue as accepted, and move the above change onto the RDFS editorial todo list. DanReceived on Saturday, 24 May 2003 05:39:29 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:33 EDT