RE: Change in definition of RDF literals

At 14:14 23/05/03 +0300, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> > Because this is parseType="Literal", the literal content is not
> > canonicalized by the parser,
>
>Don't you mean *is* canonicalized by the parser?

Er, yes!

>And for round tripping, we'd need the good old form
>
>     <Subj> <foo> XML"<span xml:lang='en'>blargh</span>" .

I don't see that.

But, as you say, let's leave the field for others to comment.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E