W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > May 2003

RE: TEST: language-and-xml-literal

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 10:46:59 +0300
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B01B90D60@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>


If lang tags in rdf:XMLLiteral typed literals are to be ignored,
then why would we preserve them in the graph for *any* of the
typed literals?

If it is in fact decided that the entailment below is valid and
reflected by the MT, then let's just nuke the lang tags from
typed literals.

Patrick


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Jos De_Roo [mailto:jos.deroo@agfa.com]
> Sent: 01 May, 2003 22:25
> To: w3c-rdfcore-wg
> Subject: TEST: language-and-xml-literal
> 
> 
> 
> Looking into all this messages/issues wrt rdf:XMLLiteral
> I would second a proposal to change the semantics in the
> way that lang tags in rdf:XMLLiteral-typed literals would
> be ignored by the semantics and reflect that in the testcase
> http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/datatypes/Manifest
> #language-and-xml-literal
> which would then become a rtest:PositiveEntailmentTest i.e.
> 
> eg:foo eg:bar "chat"@en^^rdf:XMLLiteral.
> 
> entails
> 
> eg:foo eg:bar "chat"@fr^^rdf:XMLLiteral.
> 
> I've tested that with a test implementation
> and also made a bug correction so that
> 
> :aaa :ppp "sss".
> 
> |-
> 
> :aaa :ppp _:x.
> _:x rdf:type rdfs:Literal.
> 
> As far as I've been able to read/test it, I agree
> with the other changes Pat made in the MT
> which is an impressive piece of work!
> 
> 
> -- ,
> Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 2 May 2003 03:47:07 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:26 EDT