W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2003

Re: Minutes (draft) telecon 2003-03-14, ACTION 2003-03-14#4

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:52:08 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030328145059.2c82c5a8@localhost>
To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 14:12 28/03/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote:

>At 12:33 17/03/2003 +0000, Jan Grant wrote:
>>Item 11: macgregor-01 macgregor-02
>>         http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-01
>>         http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-02
>>
>>   Proposal: to close this, with actions on editors to review for use
>>         of the term "asserted" in light of these comments.
>>   REVOLVED (0 abstain 0 against)
>>
>>ACTION 2003-03-14#4 (gk) respond wrt macgregor-01 and macgregor-02
>>         (mentioning that the other docs are being checked too)
>
>I've just sent a response, archived at:
>
>   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0599.html

That covers macgregor-01.  Do we need another for macgregor-02?

Brian
Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 09:51:27 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:15 EDT