- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 14:52:08 +0000
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>, RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 14:12 28/03/2003 +0000, Graham Klyne wrote: >At 12:33 17/03/2003 +0000, Jan Grant wrote: >>Item 11: macgregor-01 macgregor-02 >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-01 >> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#macgregor-02 >> >> Proposal: to close this, with actions on editors to review for use >> of the term "asserted" in light of these comments. >> REVOLVED (0 abstain 0 against) >> >>ACTION 2003-03-14#4 (gk) respond wrt macgregor-01 and macgregor-02 >> (mentioning that the other docs are being checked too) > >I've just sent a response, archived at: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0599.html That covers macgregor-01. Do we need another for macgregor-02? Brian
Received on Friday, 28 March 2003 09:51:27 UTC