Peter expresses this issue with much tact and delicacy, "The translation into Lbase is pointless". I am not suprised Pat disagrees. However, the suggested correction looks worthwhile. [[ [add] claim [...] G1 x-entails G2 iff TR(G1) plus the axioms for x entails TR(G2) in Lbase ]] He is not asking for a proof of such a claim, although I suspect that he would not have difficulty finding a counterexample :( I had understood this claim to be the goal of the LBase work; given it is an informative section we could make clear that such a claim is an aspiration rather than a proven fact. JeremyReceived on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 03:49:04 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:56:13 EDT