Partly wanting to nail down one of Grahams comments before sending a response on the reagle issues, and partly wanting advice from other WG members, I have drafted but not sent a response to reagle, webont and eric Prud'hommeaux concerning the XMLLiteral design changes. The draft is at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Jun/0066 I particularly would like advice on the following para: [[ Please note that the I18N-WG have made a comment criticizing this decision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0023.html which the RDF Core has not officially yet agreed a response (although we have spent more than an hour of telecon time on it, with still a majority opposing further changes). ]] Have I gone too far, or not far enough - I could even invite the others to join the fray. (I note Martin has cc-ed reagle with some of the messages). JeremyReceived on Monday, 30 June 2003 17:39:04 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:59 EDT