W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

draft response on reagle issues

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 23:38:51 +0300
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200306302338.51396.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



Partly wanting to nail down one of Grahams comments before sending a response 
on the reagle issues, and partly wanting advice from other WG members, I have 
drafted but not sent a response to reagle, webont and eric Prud'hommeaux 
concerning the XMLLiteral design changes.

The draft is at:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2003Jun/0066

I particularly would like advice on the following para:
[[
Please note that the I18N-WG have made a comment criticizing this decision:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0023.html
which the RDF Core has not officially yet agreed a response (although we have 
spent more than an hour of telecon time on it, with still a majority opposing 
further changes).
]]

Have I gone too far, or not far enough - I could even invite the others to 
join the fray. (I note Martin has cc-ed reagle with some of the messages).

Jeremy
Received on Monday, 30 June 2003 17:39:04 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:59 EDT