W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: owl:subClassOf ? [was: Re: working on it]

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:40:39 +0100 (BST)
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0306271540090.21189-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On 27 Jun 2003, Brian McBride wrote:

>
> On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 23:44, pat hayes wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > >If so, then Owl want a stronger notion of subClassOf than that proposed
> > >in this document for rdfs:subClassOf.
> >
> > It will want to impose stronger conditions on the meaning of that term, yes.
>
> I had my stronger/weaker notions mixed up apparently.  I had taken
> stronger to mean more restrictive, i.e. that
>
>   c1 owl:subClassOf c2
>
> |=
>
>   c1 rdfs:subClassOf c2
>
> But that isn't the case, right?

Can someone please provide me with a concrete counterexample of this, if
it's not the case?

-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Just because I have nothing to hide doesn't mean I have nothing to fear.
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 10:43:23 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:59 EDT