On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 18:42, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > Would that meant that the 'correct' thing for WEBONT to do would be to > > define owl:subClassOf as a subproperty of rdfs:subClassOf? > > > superproperty I must be dumb. I thought the owl notion was more restrictive, i.e. owl:subClassOf is a subset of rdfs:subClassOf but not the other way round. You are saying owl:subClassOf can have a member <c1, c2> that is not a member of rdfs:subClassOf? BrianReceived on Thursday, 26 June 2003 13:55:29 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:59 EDT