W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

[Fwd: Re: inadequate reference in Owl REF]

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 23 Jun 2003 12:51:13 +0100
To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1056369072.2641.21.camel@dhcp-91-136.hpl.hp.com>

-----Forwarded Message-----

From: Guus Schreiber <schreiber@cs.vu.nl>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: public-webont-comments@w3.org
Subject: Re: inadequate reference in Owl REF
Date: 22 Jun 2003 15:42:57 +0100

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003May/0102.html

 > Owl Reference contains:
 >
 > [[
 > The following datatypes are NOT recommended for use in OWL (see for
 > details  the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax document [OWL S&AS]):
 > ]]
 >
 > I just hunted around S&AS and couldn't find these details.  Please
 > include a more specific reference, preferably a hiperlink.
 >
 > Brian

Brian,

Thanks for your comment. In the post-LC editor's drafts this discussion 
on recommended datatypes has been moved from OWL S&AS to the RDF 
Semantics document.

We suggest the OWL Reference document simply lists the recommended 
datatypes and points for further details to the relevant section of the 
RDF Semantics document.

The link to RDF Semantics currently is:

http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_append.html#dtype_interp

but this will be updated at some appropriate later point in time.

Please let us know, cc-ing public-webont-comments@w3.org, whether this 
response is satisfactory.

Guus Schreiber

-- 
Free University Amsterdam, Computer Science
De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 20 444 7739/7718
E-mail: schreiber@cs.vu.nl
Home page: http://www.cs.vu.nl/~guus/
Received on Monday, 23 June 2003 07:53:12 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:58 EDT