Trying to nudge the process along a bit - Pat - shout if this is barmy. In this comment: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#horst-01 Herman makes a couple of points: 1) a specific example of incompleteness of the (then) closure rules 2) a general concern about the completeness of the closure rules, suggesting that the claim be weaked to apply only to a specific class of RDF graphs. I propose that: The WG resolves: The specific example pointed out is covered by the closure rules in the current document as in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jun/0119.html The present editors draft no longer claims completeness of the closure rules. That this comment be closed. Actions Arising: bwm update the official ed's draft in shadow TR space ??? respond to Herman BrianReceived on Friday, 20 June 2003 05:31:18 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:57 EDT