W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Datatypes text

From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 11:00:18 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030618105955.02fb9520@127.0.0.1>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, gk@ninebynibe.org, phayes@ai.uwf.edu, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Seems reasonable on a quick survey.

#g
--

At 23:05 17/06/03 +0300, Jeremy Carroll wrote:


>Graham, Pat, Patrick,
>
>Readiong the minutes of the 2nd May I see that I was meant to discuss with 
>you
>the text in msg
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0368
>
>I believe the major concern was with the first sentence, and that Pat was
>going to suggest a rewording to broaden it.
>
>I have currently put the text as is in the editors draft at:
>
>http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-Datatypes
>
>Patrick suggested:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0006.html
>
>"The datatype abstraction used in RDF is compatible with
>  XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes..."
>
>as the first sentence, which is certainly an improvement.
>
>Jeremy

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9  A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 06:11:40 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:56 EDT