Graham, Pat, Patrick, Readiong the minutes of the 2nd May I see that I was meant to discuss with you the text in msg http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Apr/0368 I believe the major concern was with the first sentence, and that Pat was going to suggest a rewording to broaden it. I have currently put the text as is in the editors draft at: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-Datatypes Patrick suggested: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003May/0006.html "The datatype abstraction used in RDF is compatible with XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes..." as the first sentence, which is certainly an improvement. JeremyReceived on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 17:05:27 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:56 EDT