* Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org> [2003-06-17 16:59-0400] > * Ramanathan Guha <rguha@us.ibm.com> [2003-06-17 13:24-0700] > > Can't we have a non-normative W3C Note that we refer to from the normative > > document? > > I would be happy with that. Bugfixing the closure rules is slowing down > the RECification of the main Semantics doc. The closure rules are interesting > enough to deserve their own doc, and would be no less useful as a Note. Hmm re-reading what I just sent, I'm not quite sure what 'no less useful' means, but you get the idea. Closure rules good. Note good. Time short, WG needs to finish... > DanReceived on Tuesday, 17 June 2003 17:00:32 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:56 EDT