I think we are getting to the point where responses to questions like this should refer to the text of the spec, with no adornment. Brian On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 16:48, pat hayes wrote: > Is it legal to include XML markup inside non-XMLLiteral literal > strings? For example, suppose I wanted to define a datatype called > ex:XMLnumber whose lexical space was all strings of the form > > <xmlnum>English-number-phrase</xmlnum> > > and whose L2V mapping looked like > > <xmlnum>one</xmlnum> --> 1 > <xmlnum>two</xmlnum> --> 2 > ... > <xmlnum>three hundred and ninety seven</xmlnum> --> 397 > .... > > and write literals like > > "<xmlnum>three hundred and ninety seven</xmlnum>"^^ex:XMLnumber > > to refer to 397, would that be legal RDF? There are no semantic > reasons to exclude it. > > Pat > > PS> This information has been requested by Roland and I don't know the answer.Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 08:55:25 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:57:55 EDT