Pat, Summary: You need to do some stuff on: pfps-02 pfps-06 qu-03 Checking the disposition of semantics comments, I see: Peter does not accept: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-02 Is there anything we can do on this one? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-03 I assume we go ahead with the objection; there is nothing more to say. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-04 I think we've got that one closed - I'm checking http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-05 I've asked Peter if we can now close this one. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-06 This one needs further work from you, since we have clarified that octets are not characters. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-07 I've re-asked about that one. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20030123-issues/#pfps-10 And that one. That also leaves qu-03 needing a response from you. BrianReceived on Monday, 28 July 2003 11:39:03 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:58:51 EDT