Re: Request for clarification on Canonical XML

At 10:07 03/07/25 +0100, Graham Klyne wrote:

>I think what would help here would be to define a (referencable) canonical 
>character sequence form, and use that to define the canonical octet 
>sequence representation.

That would definitely be the approach I would propose if we were
still writing that spec.

Regards,    Martin.

Received on Saturday, 26 July 2003 13:57:52 UTC