W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

RE: RDF Concepts editors draft updated

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: 24 Jul 2003 15:14:44 +0100
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, i18n <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1059056084.2327.85.camel@dhcp-91-136.hpl.hp.com>

On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 20:43, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> My latest attempt, I guess this will need one more go :(

or just:

Note: see RDF Primer [@@ref] for a discussion of representing text in an
RDF literal.

> Taking some of Graham's ideas (but not all).
> (I dropped the term "mixed content XHTML" because it is not (to my knowledge) 
> an accepted term of the art - "XML mixed content" is a sequence of text nodes 
> and element nodes, so I hoped this was clear, but it is probably safer to 
> avoid it).
> [[
> For text that may contain markup, use typed literals with type rdf:XMLLiteral. 
> If language annotation is required, it must be explicitly included as markup, 
> usually by means of an xml:lang attribute. [XHTML] may be included within RDF 
> in this way. Sometimes, in this latter case, an additional span or div 
> element is needed to carry an xml:lang or lang attribute. 
> ]]
> Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 24 July 2003 10:20:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:06 UTC