- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:10:57 +0100
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- CC: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, i18n <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Frank Manola wrote: > > 2. What happens if someone, instead of using parsetype="Literal", > writes an element with markup content as a regular typed literal with an > rdf:datatype attribute value of rdf:XMLLiteral? I would assume this is > supposed to work the same way as writing parsetype="Literal", and the > element content needs to obey the same rules, but we don't explicitly > say anything about it (either saying it's allowed, and it works the same > way, or explicitly forbidding it). Syntax doesn't seem to explicitly > cover this case either. > > --Frank The lowest cost technique to achieve clarity without over investing in this corner case, would be to add another test case that does precisely that. The syntax doc could link to it, maybe - but this certainly is not primer material. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 16:11:34 UTC