Re: call for agenda items

Please add the test case, and I thought the subPropertyOne looked good 
too.  I'll put on agenda for approval tomorrow.

Brian

Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> This might be a question about the meeting I missed ...
> 
> 
> Have we added a horst-01 test case?
> 
> We should (or perhaps merely could) add a test that is more or less 
> Herman's initial comment and say that it is a non-entailment.
> 
> I would then also add this very same test to the OWL test suite as an 
> entailment.
> 
> If we have not done so then we could have this on the agenda.
> 
> (I may be a little late tomorrow, and will not be reading my e-mail 
> before the meeting. In one scenario I will also not be available after 
> the first 60 minutes).
> 
> (I could probably manage to add the test case to the website this 
> evening if prompted to do so).
> 
> Jeremy