further horst-01 test case

I believe we agreed on if semantics for subPropertyOf

Does the following test case capture the lack of "only if"


eg:p rdfs:range xsd:integer .
eg:p rdfs:range xsd:string .
eg:q rdf:type rdf:Property .

does not entail (even with knowledge of xsd:integer and xsd:string)

eg:p rdfs:subPropertyOf eg:q .

(but does in OWL Full).

Jeremy