- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: 17 Jul 2003 13:24:06 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>, rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, i18n <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Jeremy, For clarity, I think the "current approach" refers to the one in the current ed's working drafts per previous WG decisions. Is that what is overcoming you with pain? Brian On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 12:49, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > I will need to change a number of OWL Test Cases, which have natural > language XML Literals being used in OWL. > I will need to add additional span elements. > These are handwritten. > > I am overcome with pain. > > Jeremy > > > Brian McBride wrote: > > > On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 16:48, Graham Klyne wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > >>My impression is that no showstopper has been identified, but the current > >>approach will be quite painful for some. > >> > > > > Have we identified whom? > > > > Brian > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2003 08:25:19 UTC