Re: Proposal

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Frank Manola wrote:
> 
> Thanks.  As I said in my original message, this is a related issue
> then.  That is, you may think that the XML namespace information
> *should* be carried over into the XML literal, per your response to my
> question #3, but if you look at the Test Case associated with Example 9
> of the Syntax specification, example09.rdf (the RDF/XML) has the "a"
> namespace declaration, but that namespace declaration does not appear in
> the XML literal generated as the object of the corresponding output RDF
> triple (example09.nt).

That was a bug, which I've fixed for the next draft.

The test cases for XML literal do show the namespaces being declared
properly as defined by exc14n.

Dave

Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 07:35:25 UTC