W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: [Fwd: Re: Summary of strings, markup, and language tagging in RDF (resend)]

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2003 22:03:30 +0100
Message-ID: <3F088EA2.5080506@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, duerst@w3.org

Two minor corrections only.

Brian McBride wrote:

> 2. RDFCore agrees with last call feedback that it received, that


That was actually first call feedback on the abstract syntax.

> building an XML specific mechanism into its core model is architecturaly
> inappropriate - it mixes things that should be independent.  Accepting
> this implies that parseType="Literal" values must use one of the
> existing mechanisms - i.e. either plain literals or typed literals, or a
> new more general mechanism must be invented, e.g. a new triple
> structure.  An XML specific mechanism is undesirable.



> 
> 4. Taking the datatype approach creates the opportunity to subclass the
> datatype XMLLiteral, so that the value of a property may be restricted
> to a specific form of XML Literal, possibly specified using XML Schema.


This would be a future extension ... could I suggest adding the word 
'future' into this point, on its next iteration.
Received on Sunday, 6 July 2003 17:04:10 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:58:43 EDT