W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Semantics review: fat?

From: pat hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 18:16:11 -0500
Message-Id: <p0600124dbb2bba435dcd@[10.0.100.7]>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

>Is 'fat' sufficiently PC?

Well, what's the opposite of 'lean' ? 'well-muscled'? But I now find 
that the bloody definition isn't even used anywhere, so I will elide 
it.  Done.

If anyone complains that 'non-lean' isnt good English style, then 
they can go eat corn.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC	(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   home
40 South Alcaniz St.	(850)202 4416   office
Pensacola			(850)202 4440   fax
FL 32501			(850)291 0667    cell
phayes@ihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
Received on Friday, 4 July 2003 19:16:11 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:58:43 EDT