Peter, with reference to your comment http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0093.html archived as pfps-02, we accept your comment. As you know, there have been extensive modifications to the treatment of XML literals since your comment was written. The current editor's draft http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes/RDF_Semant_Edit_Weak.html#Lbase now contains a version of the Lbase translation rules which I believe adequately covers the case you mention. XML Literals are now treated exactly uniformly with other typed literals in the Lbase axioms. Please reply to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org, indicating whether this response adequately addresses your comment. Sincerely -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home 40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax FL 32501 (850)291 0667 cell phayes@ihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayesReceived on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 22:50:26 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:58:40 EDT