Please do not cross post to multiple mailing lists. This is a last call comment. Lets take on rdf-comments. Brian At 11:29 28/01/2003 +0000, Jan Grant wrote: >On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > > > > This is a last call comment concerning the test case schema > > > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/testSchema > > > > which I am making wearing the hat of an OWL Test Case editor. > > > > (Sorry I should have made this comment earlier). > > > > Within OWL Tests we reuse the RDF testSchema. > > Unfortunately the rdfs:comment-s within it, do not foresee such reuse. For > > example test:issue should be described as relating a test to an issue, > rather > > than a test to an RDF Core issue. > > > > Please generalize the comments on the following resources > > test:approval > > test:issue > > test:status > > > > > > e.g. > > > > <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test > according to > > RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment> > > > > => > > > > <rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Indicates the status of the test within a > > process, such as the RDF Core WG process.</rdfs:comment> > > > > > > Jeremy Carroll, Editor OWL Test Cases > > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-test > >I think doing so makes a lot of sense. I need some indication from chair >or process expert as to whether this change should be done immediately >(since the schema lives "outside" the LC WD) or at the end of LC >process. > >jan > >-- >jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ >Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ >"Sufficiently large"="infinite" for sufficiently large values of >"sufficiently"Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 04:53:58 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:03 UTC