W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Type of (the denotation of) a plain literal

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:23:09 +0100
To: jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Cc: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, pfps@research.bell-labs.com, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD11AC01F.F7C37141-ONC1256CB1.004DA6E2-C1256CB1.004F0E12@agfa.be>


[...]

> We have also not assigned a datatype or an rdfs class for the class of
all
> untyped literals. I believe this to be a minor error that we may wish to
> consider fixing at some point. (It makes it difficult to state certain
range
> constraints.)

indeed a minor point and a while back in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Dec/0244.html
we felt that need to do the testcases and assumed
rdfs:PlainLiteral rdfs:subClassOf rdfs:Literal
but rdfs:PlainLiteral *not* a rdfs:Datatype


-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Friday, 17 January 2003 09:23:57 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:22 EDT