W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Edits to concepts document, per 2003-01-10 telecon

From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:17:17 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030116161606.0375b5f8@localhost>
To: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, <GK@ninebynine.org>
Cc: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>

At 11:30 16/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Graham Klyne [mailto:GK@ninebynine.org]
> > Sent: 15 January, 2003 16:45
> > To: Brian McBride
> > Cc: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere); w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> > Subject: RE: Edits to concepts document, per 2003-01-10 telecon
> >
> >
> > I'm OK with Patrick's, modulo s/model/pattern/.   (I think
> > yet another use
> > of "model" maybe unhelpful.)
>
>Fair enough, though I had a very hard time reconciling any
>interpretation of 'pattern' I'm familiar with to the definition
>of rdfs:Datatype.
>
>Perhaps 'framework'? Or maybe just repeat 'abstraction', which
>is of course consistent with the beginning of the paragraph.
>
>Still, I'll leave that to editorial discretion.

I have updated the text to:

[[RDF uses the datatype abstraction defined by XML Schema Part 2: Datatypes 
[XML-SCHEMA2], and may be used with any datatype definition that conforms 
to this abstraction, even if not actually defined in terms of XML Schema.]]

Please shout if you disagree.

Brian
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2003 11:16:06 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:21 EDT