W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Critical typo in Schema doc regarding rdfs:isDefinedBy

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:15:57 +0200
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B160C79@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Brian McBride [mailto:bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com]
> Sent: 15 January, 2003 11:18
> To: Stickler Patrick (NMP/Tampere); w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Critical typo in Schema doc regarding rdfs:isDefinedBy
> 
> 
> Since Danbri hasn't responded, let me stick in a few words here:
> 
> At 10:35 14/01/2003 +0200, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > > ... Hmm...
> > > > note that it
> > > > does say "indicates *the* resource defining the subject
> > > > resource" [emphasis
> > > > added], which seems to imply that you can only specify a single
> > > > rdfs:isDefinedBy property for a resource. Might be worth an
> > > > rdf-comments
> > > > mail, but I reckon it's a typo (should be "a resource").
> > >
> > > It's surely a typo. One can have multiple rdfs:isDefinedBy
> > > values, where each provide a component of the definition
> > > (e.g. just one example, separate RDF Schemas that define
> > > labels and comments for particular languages, where a given
> > > term then has definition in as many schemas as there are
> > > languages defined.
> > >
> > > I'll ping the editor on this.
> >
> >This may have already been caught, but I consider this
> >to be a critical error that must be fixed before last
> >call.
> 
> Hmm, I can't find the text you complain of in the last call candidate.
> 
>    
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-schema-20030117/#ch_isdefinedby

Brian

It appears it has already been fixed. Great.

Patrick
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 05:16:08 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:20 EDT