W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > January 2003

RE: Critical literal semantics issue

From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:27:57 +0200
Message-ID: <A03E60B17132A84F9B4BB5EEDE57957B160C67@trebe006.europe.nokia.com>
To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Cc: <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

> > All this means is that rdfs:Literal denotes a class, but it 
> says nothing
> > about the class extension of rdfs:Literal.  
> The class extension of rdfs:Literal is understood to be a subset of LV
> (see further comments below), i.e. all resources which are 
> denoted by a 
> plain (untyped) literal or a valid typed literal are in LV and hence
> instances of rdfs:Literal.

Or rather, the class extension of rdfs:Literal *is* LV.

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2003 04:28:02 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:20 EDT