W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-13

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:42:06 +0000 (GMT)
To: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0302141056010.27130-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

On Fri, 7 Feb 2003, Jan Grant wrote:

(LC comments appear starting the 23 Jan)
(that is, the thread starting with message 0192)
- a pointer to the comment status tracking page doesn't appear to be on
the WG home page.

Stuff that Brian's allocated tracking IDs for no longer appear, since I
presume he'll chase these down himself.

(By the way, occasionally I use "OP" to signify "original poster" below)


New things:

Herman ter Horst on RDF graph equality
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0203.html
	General comment in support of terminological change, no followup.

PFPS: error in semantics document
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0206.html
	He's right, and I thought I'd seen Pat respond, but there's
	no followup in the archive I can see.

PFPS: questionable statement in RDF semantics
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0208.html
	He's got a point (although it's borderline), no followup.

Olivier Corby on XMLLiteral
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0209.html
	Pat responds: does his answer satisfy? No ack from OP yet.

Bob MacGragor on Statings "Much ado about nothing"
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0211.html
	Call to ditch semantics section 3.2.1. Maybe Brian should
	pick this up?

Dan Brickley: editorial suggestion for RDF test cases
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0212.html
	Jan acks, suggests striking the slightly obsolete text.
	Danbri's ok with that, final disposition required.

Dan C: reification lacks examples
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0215.html
	Brian gives this id danc-03, will not appear in future summaries

Dan C: PICS, RDF, bagid, examples?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0216.html
	Danbri: not on your nelly. Note in question needs revision.
	Solicits opinions from Ralph.
	[note not part of LC documents, will not chase next week]

Qu Yuzhong on RDF Semantics:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0220.html
	No followup.

Qu Yuzhong on appendix A of schema/vocab:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0219.html
	No followup.

Dave Hodder on syntax / xhtml and rdf:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0221.html
	Assigned id hodder-01; won't appear here next week.

Tim BL (A developer) on bagid:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0226.html
	Lots of followup, no disposition yet.

Pat Hayes on lang tags in typed literals:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0228.html
	Pat Stickler agrees; Brian concerned about second LC.
	No disposition yet.

epromote on business broadband:
	Looks like a fantastic offer to me, how can you refuse?

Stuart Williams with a load of comments on concepts:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0238.html
	No response yet (just a day or two old)

Erick Calder typo in schema
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0243.html
	No ack.




Older messages updated status:

Guus Schreiber comments on rdfs:
 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0110.html
 	Brian asked for clarification, no response.

PFPS blank node identifiers in syntax:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0119.html
	Dave responds proposing his fix.

Bob MacGregor: two comments
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0125.html
	Frank and Bob in clarification (no issue yet?)

PFPS: Can RDF say anything about anything?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0148.html
	Brian seeking clarification, example.
	Clarification supplied, n tracking numbers yet.

PFPS: what's an RDF namespace?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0150.html
	Patrick Stickler agrees; Pete Johnston agrees; no disposition.

Arjohn Kampman: duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0156.html
	Pat acks, will be fixed. No [close]

Arjohn Kampman: rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ???
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0159.html
	Pat acks, will be fixed, no [close]

Martin Duerst: URi -> URI
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0163.html
	Typo, but no ack. (no tracking number)

Pete Johnston: typos in examples:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0188.html
	Frank acks; no [closed]

PFPS the meaning of RDF Tokens:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.html
	Pat responds
	Frank: is this the same as an earlier comment? (no response yet)

PFPS social meaning and RDF:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.htm
	Seth's comments are LCcomments until we know otherwise - bwm.


Dangling things:

Ossi Nykaanen: multiple comments
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0166.html
	No followup (two weeks)

PFPS: divergences between rdf semantics and rdf schema
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0124.html
	No followup that I can see. (Two weeks now)


DanC: semantics typo (misplaced paren)
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0137.html
	No followup

PFPS: what is RDF Schema?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0149.html
	No followup (Two weeks, this might be being chased in another
	thread?)

PFPS: what is the expressive power of RDF?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0154.html
	No followup (two weeks)

PFPS: rdf graphs in RDF Semantics
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0174.html
	No followup (two weeks)


[closed] things:

Marc Carrion's "abstract class"
 	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0073.html
 	[closed], not an issue, "This can wait"

Ossi Nykaanen: multiple comments
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0179.html
	[closed], discussion died.

jan grant: test case issue
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0108.html
	[closed], disposition was accepted.

Danbri: typo in tc charter intro
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0132.html
	[closed], typo acked


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
"NOP" is a trivial implementation of an executable Z subset.
Received on Friday, 14 February 2003 06:44:10 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:50 EDT