W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Re: Agenda (lc process)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:01:43 -0600
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-id: <1045180903.8908.113.camel@dirk.dm93.org>

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 17:05, bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com wrote:
> 11: Timely Responsiveness to Comments
> I have the impression that a number of comments are languishing with no
> responses from the editors.  Is this a good thing?

Sometimes lots of comments raise the same issue, so
it can be efficient to let some things queue up.

I just browsed thr archive...

and I think anybody who looked at it would agree we're
spending considerable effort to be resonsive.

I'm particularly curious to hear from Jan in regard
to his weekly audit.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2003 19:01:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:04 UTC