W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Agenda for RDFCore WG Telecon 2003-02-07

From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:07:52 GMT
Message-ID: <7791465.1044619757650.JavaMail.bwm@MCBRIDE-B-7>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

Time:
10:00:00 Fri Feb 07 2003 in America/New York duration 60 minutes

which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Feb 07 2003 in Europe/London

Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.w3.org #rdfcore

1: This weeks scribe is Jan


2: Roll Call


3: Review Agenda


4: Next telecon 07 Feb 2003
Volunteer Scribe



5: Minutes of 31 Jan 2003 telecon

See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0241.html


6: Soliciting Last Call Reviews
2003-01-24#4  em  Send msg to David of XMLP asking for relevant LC review      
2003-01-24#5  danbri  Send msg to SVG asking for relevant LC review      
2003-01-24#6  danbri  Send msg to XHTML WG asking for relevant LC review      
2003-01-24#7  danbri  Send msg to RDF IG about LC
2003-01-24#10 danbri  remind RSS people to send their comments to 
                      www-rdf-comments
 


7: Handling last call comments.
see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0198.html

Any comments, patricularly on the use of change ID's.

bwm has been wondering whether it would be most effective to wait till
we have all the comments in, before deciding dispositions.
  
             


8: Subject/Predicate/Object terminology
see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0066.html

Concepts defines the subject and predicate of a triple to be URIs and
the object to be a URI or a literal.  Schema conforms with this and
also states that the subject of a statement is the resource denoted by
the subject of the corresponding triple, etc, to be consistent with
m&s reification vocabulary.

We need to have consistent usage across the docs.  Propose adopt above
usage and action editors to check their docs for consistency.
         


9: Format of References in Docs



10: Comments Review
with thanks to Jan, see:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Feb/0071.html

Editors please review and complete process.  



11: XML Schema 1.1 Requirements
What needs to be done to complete this?


See:
  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0163.html



------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant, running on Jena 2
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 07:08:04 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:49 EDT