W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

Quick -comments summary upto and including 2003-02-05

From: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:37:38 +0000 (GMT)
To: RDFCore Working Group <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0302070950500.23213-100000@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk>

(LC comments appear starting the 23 Jan)
(that is, the thread starting with message 0192)
- a pointer to the comment status tracking page doesn't appear to be on
the WG home page.

I've summarised all threads with comments below. In future messages,
I'll only summarise _new_ threads. Stuff that's been assigned an issue
number and stuff that's been closed won't show up. Stuff where dialogue
started but no issue numbers or closure has happened will still appear.




Marc Carrion's "abstract class"
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0073.html
	Ongoing discussion(?)

Brian has tracking IDs for the following issues:

PFPS untyped literals:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0085.html
	Pat responded

PFPS datatypes:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0086.html
	Pat responded

PFPS typed literals:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0087.html
	Pat responds

PFPS typed literals + lang tags:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0088.html
	Pat responds.

PFPS XML literals and LV
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0089.html
	Pat responds

PSPF RDFS closure rules:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0090.html
	Pat responds

PFPS RDF closure rules:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0091.html
	Pat responds

PFPS translation into lbase:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0092.html
	Response from Pat

PFPS lbase / xml literals:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0093.html
	Response from Pat

PFPS xml schema datatypes:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0094.html
	Pat responds

Other messages:

Guus Schreiber comments on rdfs:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0110.html
	Brian asked for clarification

DanC issues -01 and -02:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0112.html
	Assigned tracking numbers, discussion continues on rdfcore

Joseph Reagle on canonicalisation & co:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0128.html
	Brian assigns two tracking numbers.

PFPS blank node identifiers in syntax:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0119.html
	Dave responds proposing his fix.

PFPS on informal meaning in RDFS vocabulary:
	Brian summarises and records as pfps-11

PFPS on non-well-formed lists in vocab:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0155.html
	Brian summarises and records as pfps-12

Bob MacGregor: two comments
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0125.html
	Frank and Bob in clarification (no issue yet?)

Daniel Kreck: emptyPropertyElt ambiguity
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0127.html
	Recorded as kreck-01

PFPS: Can RDF say anything about anything?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0148.html
	Brian seeking clarification, example.

PFPS: what's an RDF namespace?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0150.html
	Patrick Stickler agrees; Pete Johnston agrees; no disposition.

PFPS: what's an rdf datatype? (ie, what about the facets?)
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0152.html
	Recorded as pfps-13

Arjohn Kampman: duplicate axioms in RDF MT doc
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0156.html
	Pat acks, will be fixed. No [close]

Arjohn Kampman: rdfs:Datatype rdfs:subClassOf ???
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0159.html
	Pat acks, will be fixed, no [close]

Martin Duerst: URi -> URI
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0163.html
	Typo, but no ack.

Ossi Nykaanen: multiple comments
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0166.html
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0179.html
	Brian seeks clarification: discussion or an issue?

Pete Johnston: typos in examples:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0188.html
	Frank acks; no [closed]

PFPS the meaning of RDF Tokens:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.html
	Pat responds

PFPS social meaning and RDF:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0191.htm
	Response from Pat, folloup from Seth, gentle "get orf our
	-comments list!" from Brian - no resolution I can see thus far.
	Not clear if this is a new issue or should be merged with other
	PFPS social meaning comments.



Dangling things:

jan grant: test case issue
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0108.html
	Dangling! jan to follow up saying he agrees with himself :-)

PFPS: divergences between rdf semantics and rdf schema
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0124.html
	No followup that I can see.

Danbri: typo in tc charter intro
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0132.html
	No followup; fix and close!

DanC: semantics typo (misplaced paren)
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0137.html
	No followup

PFPS: what is RDF Schema?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0149.html
	No followup

PFPS: what is the expressive power of RDF?
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0154.html
	No followup

PFPS: rdf graphs in RDF Semantics
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0174.html
	No followup.


[closed] things:

JJC on testSchema:
	http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0115.html
	Agreed, fixed, [closed] sent (won't appear in future summaries)


-- 
jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/
Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/
Q: What's yellow and equivalent to the axiom of choice? A: Zorn's lemon.
Received on Friday, 7 February 2003 05:38:46 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:55:49 EDT