Re: response to issue pfps-10

At 21:54 05/02/2003 +0000, Brian McBride wrote:

[...]

>The thread on pfps-07 ending in:
>
>[[Oh, I see. It is significant for *ill-formed* typed literals.
>]]

bit of text accidentally missed out.

I meant to say that looked line a fine piece of clarification, then go on 
to say, but a closing summary would have been good.

Brian