W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > February 2003

RE: RDF Semantics: Interpretations and Modelling

From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 17:19:59 +0000
Message-Id: <>
To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org

At 03:03 PM 2/3/03 -0600, pat hayes wrote:
>The key point however is that this information - about being a bag - does 
>not impose any restrictions on formal interpretations which can be 
>expressed as valid entailments. There are no valid entailments about rdf 
>Bags that are not also valid of rdf Seqs; the rdf model theory isn't able 
>to distinguish between bags and sequences;

Is this particular point expressed this succinctly in the text?

(I'm thinking this might be a crisper way of exemplifying the formal/other 
meaning issue in Concepts)


Graham Klyne
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2003 12:48:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:54:04 UTC